|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
06/10/2017 |
Actualizado : |
06/10/2017 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Temas Institucionales |
Autor : |
FERRARO, B.; OVIEDO, S.; GUTIERREZ, N. (Ed.). |
Afiliación : |
BRUNO FERRARO ALBERTONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SEBASTIAN OVIEDO ALCOBA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; NICOLAS GUTIERREZ SALGUES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Plan Estratégico 2016-2020 Visión 2030. Ciencia y tecnología para un agro inteligente, innovador, competitivo y sostenible, al servicio del país. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2017. |
Páginas : |
60 p. |
Serie : |
(Temas Institucionales; 15) |
ISBN : |
978-9974-38-338-3 |
ISSN : |
1688-9347 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Notas : |
Miembros de la Junta Directiva de INIA: Ing. Agr., MSc., PhD. Álvaro Roel, Presidente; D.M.T.V., PhD. José Luis Repetto, Vicepresidente; Ing. Agr. Jorge Peñagaricano; Ing. Agr., MSc. Diego Payssé; Ing. Agr. Pablo Gorriti; Ing. Agr. Alberto Bozzo. Comité Gerencial: Ing. Agr. PhD. Fabio Montossi, Director Nacional; Ing. Agr. PhD. Jorge Sawchik, Gerente de Investigación; Ing. Agr. PhD. Miguel Sierra, Gerente de Innovación y Comunicación; Ing. Agr. Jorge Urtiaga, Gerente de Operaciones. Coordinación General de la formulación del Plan:
Ing. Agr. PhD. Jorge Sawchik; Ing. Agr. PhD. Miguel Sierra. Equipo técnico responsable de la formulación del Plan: Cr. Bruno Ferraro; Lic. Sebastián Oviedo; Ing. Agr. PhD. Nicolás Gutiérrez. Agradecimientos: Apoyo CPA Ferrere: Cr. Gonzalo Icasuriaga, Cr. Gerardo Barcos, y Ec. Sebastian Ithurralde.
Técnicos Referentes en cada estación: Ing. Agr. Dra. Victoria Bonnecarrère, Ing. Agr. Dr. Fernando Lattanzi, Ing. Agr. PhD. Rafael Reyno, Ing. Agr. PhD. Graciela Quintans, Ing. Agr. Dr. Esteban Vicente. Directores de Programa: Ing. Agr. PhD. Roberto Zoppolo, Ing. Agr. PhD. Alfredo Albín, Ing. Agr. PhD. Santiago Fariña, Ing. Agr. Dr. Gustavo Giménez, Ing. Agr. PhD. José Terra, Ing. For. Dr. Roberto Scoz, Ing. Agr. PhD. Fernando Rivas, Ing. Agr. MSc. Gonzalo Zorrilla, Ing. Agr. Dr. Fernando Lattanzi , Ing. Agr. PhD. Gabriel Ciappesoni, Ing. Agr. MSc. Sergio Ceretta. Coordinadores de Unidades Técnicas, Plataformas y Áreas: Ing. Agr. MSc. Agustín Giménez, Ing. Agr. MSc. Carlos Rossi, Ing. Agr. Mag. Raúl Gómez, Ing. Agr. MSc. Ernesto Restaino, Ing. Agr. PhD. Marco Dalla Rizza, Ing. Agr. PhD. Nora Altier, Lic. MSc. Verónica Musselli, DMV Dr. Franklin Riet. Directores Regionales: Ing. Agr. MSc. Santiago Cayota, DMTV Darío Hirigoyen, Ing. Agr. MSc. Fernando Carrau, Ing. Agr. PhD. Walter Ayala, Ing. Agr. PhD. Gustavo Brito. Colaboradores en INIA: Evelyn Fernández (edición y redacción); Cra. Cecilia Salvagiot; Cra. MBA. Gabriela Molina; Ing. Agr. MSc. Marcelo Salvagno (revisión y ajuste de Mapa Estratégico); Lic. Verónica Darino, Cra. Victoria Genta, Cr. MBA. Leonardo Hespanhol (Gerencia de Operaciones). Lista de expositores del Think Tank: Cr. Enrique Iglesias (Fundación Astur); Dr. Walter Baethgen (IRI-Columbia); Dr. Ramón Méndez (MVOTMA); Dr. Pablo Tittonell (INTA); Dr. Gustavo Crespi (BID); Dra. Silvia María Fonseca Silveira Massruhá (EMBRAPA); Dr. Rafael Radi (Facultad de Medicina-UdelaR); Ing. Agr. Marcos Guigou (ADP); Dra. Liliana Borzacconi (Facultad de Química-UdelaR). Miembros de los Consejos Asesores Regionales; equipo técnico de OPYPA-MGAP; referentes del sector que participaron en instancias de
discusión a nivel de los Sistemas; funcionarios de INIA en general. |
Contenido : |
Este documento presenta el Plan Estratégico Institucional (PEI) de?nido por INIA para el período 2016-2020, integrando una visión de mediano plazo al año 2030. Se generó a partir de un proceso participativo que contó con el aporte de más de 350 referentes nacionales e internacionales, del ámbito privado y público, así como de todos los funcionarios del Instituto. Más de 550 personas participaron de esta re?exión colectiva. En él se alinean visiones, se de?nen objetivos y metas para abordar los desafíos estratégicos que INIA y el país tienen planteados para abordar el presente y, sobre todo, el futuro. |
Palabras claves : |
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH; INSTITUTIONS; LINEAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN; MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES. |
Thesagro : |
GESTION; INSTITUTOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN; INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA; PLAN ESTRATÉGICO. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/7346/1/INIA-PEI-2016-2020-tema-Inst.15.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04346nam a2200313 a 4500 001 1057641 005 2017-10-06 008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 020 $a978-9974-38-338-3 022 $a1688-9347 100 1 $aFERRARO, B. 245 $aPlan Estratégico 2016-2020 Visión 2030. Ciencia y tecnología para un agro inteligente, innovador, competitivo y sostenible, al servicio del país.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aMontevideo (UY): INIA$c2017 300 $a60 p. 490 $a(Temas Institucionales; 15) 500 $aMiembros de la Junta Directiva de INIA: Ing. Agr., MSc., PhD. Álvaro Roel, Presidente; D.M.T.V., PhD. José Luis Repetto, Vicepresidente; Ing. Agr. Jorge Peñagaricano; Ing. Agr., MSc. Diego Payssé; Ing. Agr. Pablo Gorriti; Ing. Agr. Alberto Bozzo. Comité Gerencial: Ing. Agr. PhD. Fabio Montossi, Director Nacional; Ing. Agr. PhD. Jorge Sawchik, Gerente de Investigación; Ing. Agr. PhD. Miguel Sierra, Gerente de Innovación y Comunicación; Ing. Agr. Jorge Urtiaga, Gerente de Operaciones. Coordinación General de la formulación del Plan: Ing. Agr. PhD. Jorge Sawchik; Ing. Agr. PhD. Miguel Sierra. Equipo técnico responsable de la formulación del Plan: Cr. Bruno Ferraro; Lic. Sebastián Oviedo; Ing. Agr. PhD. Nicolás Gutiérrez. Agradecimientos: Apoyo CPA Ferrere: Cr. Gonzalo Icasuriaga, Cr. Gerardo Barcos, y Ec. Sebastian Ithurralde. Técnicos Referentes en cada estación: Ing. Agr. Dra. Victoria Bonnecarrère, Ing. Agr. Dr. Fernando Lattanzi, Ing. Agr. PhD. Rafael Reyno, Ing. Agr. PhD. Graciela Quintans, Ing. Agr. Dr. Esteban Vicente. Directores de Programa: Ing. Agr. PhD. Roberto Zoppolo, Ing. Agr. PhD. Alfredo Albín, Ing. Agr. PhD. Santiago Fariña, Ing. Agr. Dr. Gustavo Giménez, Ing. Agr. PhD. José Terra, Ing. For. Dr. Roberto Scoz, Ing. Agr. PhD. Fernando Rivas, Ing. Agr. MSc. Gonzalo Zorrilla, Ing. Agr. Dr. Fernando Lattanzi , Ing. Agr. PhD. Gabriel Ciappesoni, Ing. Agr. MSc. Sergio Ceretta. Coordinadores de Unidades Técnicas, Plataformas y Áreas: Ing. Agr. MSc. Agustín Giménez, Ing. Agr. MSc. Carlos Rossi, Ing. Agr. Mag. Raúl Gómez, Ing. Agr. MSc. Ernesto Restaino, Ing. Agr. PhD. Marco Dalla Rizza, Ing. Agr. PhD. Nora Altier, Lic. MSc. Verónica Musselli, DMV Dr. Franklin Riet. Directores Regionales: Ing. Agr. MSc. Santiago Cayota, DMTV Darío Hirigoyen, Ing. Agr. MSc. Fernando Carrau, Ing. Agr. PhD. Walter Ayala, Ing. Agr. PhD. Gustavo Brito. Colaboradores en INIA: Evelyn Fernández (edición y redacción); Cra. Cecilia Salvagiot; Cra. MBA. Gabriela Molina; Ing. Agr. MSc. Marcelo Salvagno (revisión y ajuste de Mapa Estratégico); Lic. Verónica Darino, Cra. Victoria Genta, Cr. MBA. Leonardo Hespanhol (Gerencia de Operaciones). Lista de expositores del Think Tank: Cr. Enrique Iglesias (Fundación Astur); Dr. Walter Baethgen (IRI-Columbia); Dr. Ramón Méndez (MVOTMA); Dr. Pablo Tittonell (INTA); Dr. Gustavo Crespi (BID); Dra. Silvia María Fonseca Silveira Massruhá (EMBRAPA); Dr. Rafael Radi (Facultad de Medicina-UdelaR); Ing. Agr. Marcos Guigou (ADP); Dra. Liliana Borzacconi (Facultad de Química-UdelaR). Miembros de los Consejos Asesores Regionales; equipo técnico de OPYPA-MGAP; referentes del sector que participaron en instancias de discusión a nivel de los Sistemas; funcionarios de INIA en general. 520 $aEste documento presenta el Plan Estratégico Institucional (PEI) de?nido por INIA para el período 2016-2020, integrando una visión de mediano plazo al año 2030. Se generó a partir de un proceso participativo que contó con el aporte de más de 350 referentes nacionales e internacionales, del ámbito privado y público, así como de todos los funcionarios del Instituto. Más de 550 personas participaron de esta re?exión colectiva. En él se alinean visiones, se de?nen objetivos y metas para abordar los desafíos estratégicos que INIA y el país tienen planteados para abordar el presente y, sobre todo, el futuro. 650 $aGESTION 650 $aINSTITUTOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN 650 $aINVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA 650 $aPLAN ESTRATÉGICO 653 $aAGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 653 $aINSTITUTIONS 653 $aLINEAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN 653 $aMANAGEMENT 653 $aRESEARCH 653 $aSTRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 700 1 $aOVIEDO, S. 700 1 $aGUTIERREZ, N.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha actual : |
09/03/2018 |
Actualizado : |
18/12/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
MORALES-PIÑEYRUA, J.; FARIÑA, S.; MENDOZA, A. |
Afiliación : |
JESSICA TATIANA MORALES PIÑEYRUA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO FARIÑA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria); ALEJANDRO FRANCISCO MENDOZA AGUIAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Effects of parity on productive, reproductive, metabolic and hormonal responses of Holstein cow. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Reproduction Science, v.191, p.9-21, 2018. |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.01.017 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
HIstory article: Received date: 17-1-2017; Revised date: 29-1-2018; Accepted date: 31-1-2018. |
Contenido : |
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to determine the effects that parity may have on production, reproduction and the metabolic status of Holstein cows managed in a production system based on total mixed ration and pasture. Primiparous (n?=?22) and multiparous (n?=?24) cows from a dairy farm research station in Uruguay were used in a completely randomized design. Body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS) and backfat thickness (BFT) were recorded weekly from ?30 to 70 days postpartum. Milk production was measured daily, and milk composition was determined weekly. Resumption of postpartum ovarian activity and progesterone profiles were measured three times a week based on milk progesterone. Blood was collected to determine the levels of glucose, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1), insulin, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), ?-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), albumin, total protein and cholesterol. Milk production and components were lower for primiparous cows (p?0.01) than multiparous cows. Body weights were also lower in primiparous cows than in multiparous cows (p?0.05); however, BCS and BFT were greater (p?0.01) in primiparous cows than in multiparous cows. Primiparous cows had greater levels of glucose, insulin and IGF-1 and lower concentrations of NEFA and BHB (p?0.01) than multiparous cows. The intervals from calving to first ovulation were not affected by parity; however, primiparous cows showed less abnormal cycles (27.2%) than multiparous cows (50.0%) (p?0.01). The present study found that a feeding system based on TMR and pasture was sufficient to produce over 25?L of milk per day without extending their calving to first ovulation interval in primiparous and multiparous cows. However, multiparous cows showed a greater imbalance in metabolic and hormonal profiles than primiparous cows, causing abnormal ovarian activity. MenosAbstract:
The objective of this study was to determine the effects that parity may have on production, reproduction and the metabolic status of Holstein cows managed in a production system based on total mixed ration and pasture. Primiparous (n?=?22) and multiparous (n?=?24) cows from a dairy farm research station in Uruguay were used in a completely randomized design. Body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS) and backfat thickness (BFT) were recorded weekly from ?30 to 70 days postpartum. Milk production was measured daily, and milk composition was determined weekly. Resumption of postpartum ovarian activity and progesterone profiles were measured three times a week based on milk progesterone. Blood was collected to determine the levels of glucose, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1), insulin, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), ?-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), albumin, total protein and cholesterol. Milk production and components were lower for primiparous cows (p?0.01) than multiparous cows. Body weights were also lower in primiparous cows than in multiparous cows (p?0.05); however, BCS and BFT were greater (p?0.01) in primiparous cows than in multiparous cows. Primiparous cows had greater levels of glucose, insulin and IGF-1 and lower concentrations of NEFA and BHB (p?0.01) than multiparous cows. The intervals from calving to first ovulation were not affected by parity; however, primiparous cows showed less abnormal cycles (27.2%) than multiparous cows (50.0%) (p?0.... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
ANESTROUS; DAIRY COW; ENDOCRINOLOGY; GRAZING SYSTEM; PERI-PARTURITION. |
Thesagro : |
REPRODUCCION ANIMAL. |
Asunto categoría : |
L53 Fisiología Animal - Reproducción |
Marc : |
LEADER 02672naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1058225 005 2018-12-18 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.01.017$2DOI 100 1 $aMORALES-PIÑEYRUA, J. 245 $aEffects of parity on productive, reproductive, metabolic and hormonal responses of Holstein cow.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aHIstory article: Received date: 17-1-2017; Revised date: 29-1-2018; Accepted date: 31-1-2018. 520 $aAbstract: The objective of this study was to determine the effects that parity may have on production, reproduction and the metabolic status of Holstein cows managed in a production system based on total mixed ration and pasture. Primiparous (n?=?22) and multiparous (n?=?24) cows from a dairy farm research station in Uruguay were used in a completely randomized design. Body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS) and backfat thickness (BFT) were recorded weekly from ?30 to 70 days postpartum. Milk production was measured daily, and milk composition was determined weekly. Resumption of postpartum ovarian activity and progesterone profiles were measured three times a week based on milk progesterone. Blood was collected to determine the levels of glucose, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1), insulin, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), ?-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), albumin, total protein and cholesterol. Milk production and components were lower for primiparous cows (p?0.01) than multiparous cows. Body weights were also lower in primiparous cows than in multiparous cows (p?0.05); however, BCS and BFT were greater (p?0.01) in primiparous cows than in multiparous cows. Primiparous cows had greater levels of glucose, insulin and IGF-1 and lower concentrations of NEFA and BHB (p?0.01) than multiparous cows. The intervals from calving to first ovulation were not affected by parity; however, primiparous cows showed less abnormal cycles (27.2%) than multiparous cows (50.0%) (p?0.01). The present study found that a feeding system based on TMR and pasture was sufficient to produce over 25?L of milk per day without extending their calving to first ovulation interval in primiparous and multiparous cows. However, multiparous cows showed a greater imbalance in metabolic and hormonal profiles than primiparous cows, causing abnormal ovarian activity. 650 $aREPRODUCCION ANIMAL 653 $aANESTROUS 653 $aDAIRY COW 653 $aENDOCRINOLOGY 653 $aGRAZING SYSTEM 653 $aPERI-PARTURITION 700 1 $aFARIÑA, S. 700 1 $aMENDOZA, A. 773 $tAnimal Reproduction Science$gv.191, p.9-21, 2018.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|